• No categories

This agreement becomes ——————————— the —————- of and between: M/S———————————————————————————————, (hereafter called first PARTY, the expression is repugnant, unless it is contrary to context or importance, therefore as its successor in the economy, the executor, the administrators and the legal assignment). CONSIDERING that after mutual discussion part of FIRST PARTY, the air-conditioned showroom of SECOND PARTY with a size of about ———— Sq. ft. In ———————————————————————————————————- Outlet for the retail sale of these products—————————————————————- and, therefore, the parties entered into this agreement on the following terms; It is expressly understood by and between the parties and it is agreed that the Company is at all times the exclusive and exclusive owner of the product supplied or transferred by FIRST PARTY under this Contract and/or in possession of SECOND PARTY or in transit. Nothing is included here but to create any ownership rights over the products in favour of the consignment agent. The products still belong to the FIRST FEST and remain in the judicial custody of the FIRST FEST. 26. Two sets of the agreement are prepared, one signed with the FIRST PARTY party and the other with the SECOND PARTY and duly signed by both parties before the witnesses. 1. That both parties agree that the proposed retail showroom should be used exclusively as a retail store for products provided by the FIRST PARTY party. All additional premises, provided they are offered by THE SECOND PARTY, will be added with the mutual agreement of both parties. You might wonder why it would be permissible for an organization to self-declare itself to meet an ISO standard? Indeed, ISO itself has what is called the principle of neutrality, and this principle states that ISO is agnostic when it comes to third-party certification or accreditation.

Given that there are expenses and other considerations related to third-party certification or accreditation, ISO wanted its standards to be available at all levels, even though the only level the organization could achieve was to comply with the standard and self-assess against the standard. Iso would therefore never declare that a certification body must be accredited by a third party against ISO/IEC 17024. However, we know that many certification bodies for individuals do not understand many concepts in the standard, so their “self-assessment” in relation to ISO/IEC 17024 could be as important as the self-certification of skills by a professional. The second part is defined in ISO/IEC 17000 as “compliance assessment activity performed by an individual or organization with an interest in the object” (point 2.3). This means that, in the case of ISO/CIS 17024, for example, the certification body asked a consultant to conduct an internal audit of the organization against ISO/IEC 17024 or commissioned an expert to conduct an analysis of the organization`s shortcomings against the standard. We can see where there may be a little more objectivity in this case than an initial assessment, but since there is a relationship between the certification body and the party doing the assessment, there is a risk of conflict of interest. If we think of the second part, when it comes to the certified person, rather than the professional self-reporting competency (as in the first part), the second part would be whether the person certifying the person`s competency had a relationship with the person.